Filter Your Search Results:

Alexandra in O Pioneers Essay


Alexandra Bergson - The novel's protagonist, Alexandra Bergson is a model of emotional strength, courage, and resolve. As the eldest child of the Swedish immigrant John Bergson, she inherits his farm and makes it profitable. Particularly suited to the toil of prairie life, she is a prototype of the strong American pioneer and an embodiment of the untamed American West.

Creating Civilization in the Wild:

If, as Cather famouly claimed, the land is the hero of O Pioneers!, then the novel is fundamentally a story of the wilds becoming a civilization. Each of the characters in the story attempt to make the land livable for his or herself, and each character can be judged based on his or her ability to work with the land rather than against it. Alexandra plays the primary role in the novel, even if Cather disputes her status as heroine, because she understands how to work with the land to bring out its riches. Once Alexandra has succeeded and has built up her farm, it is described thus:

There was something individual about the great farm, a most unusual trimness and care for detail. . .. You feel that, properly, Alexandra's house is the big out-of-doors, and that it is in the soil that she expresses herself best.

In contrast to Alexandra, the other Bergsons have less reciporical relationships with the land. Lou and Oscar impose their will on the land, laboring long and hard without understanding that this land is different from other land they have seen. They attack the land; they don't respect it. As another example, Mrs. Bergson never stops comparing this land and life in Nebraska to the one she left behind in Norway. She lacks an openness to the environment she finds herself in, preferring instead to yearn for the land of her birth. Thus, she will never be able to find happiness in Nebraska.

Frank Shabata's and Emil's flaws can also be seen through their attitude towards the land. Frank Shabata makes an effort to farm in order to achieve success, but he cannot tolerate the work without the reward of occasional drinking binges. Emil sometimes feels he loves the land, but he finds labor to be unsatisfying. Frank and Emil act out of wildness. They cannot tame the land, because they have not tamed themselves.

The difficult relationship between the individual and society is one of the most enduring themes of American culture, and, as such, figures prominently in American literature. America's first Puritan forebears were dissenters, forced to reconcile their impulse toward revolution against the society that confined them with their faith in the sanctity of the idea of community. Since then, America has been marked by the uneasy balance between the forces of the personal and the public, between those of individual dreams and the great American Dream. Willa Cather's first great novel, O Pioneers!, addresses itself in large part to that uneasy balance. In the story of Alexandra Bergson, the novel measures the potency of the remarkable individual against universal human desires and the forces of national history.

The uneasiness that marks the characters' relationship with society and history in O Pioneers! is also present in their relationship with the land. The land is their home and their livelihood, and it constitutes the promise that they sought in moving to the West. Cather gives the land a force and presence of its own, utterly independent, even disdainful, of human settlement: "the great fact" of prairie life, she writes in the first chapter, "was the land itself." She imbues the prairie with a vast inescapability and an undeniable power over those who attempt to exert their will upon it; the land itself is what matters, not the people who inhabit it. Thus the land of O Pioneers!, in particular, and the West, in general, become timeless and impersonal in their massive scale. Cather writes that the land wants and feels; it gives and it takes, leaving the pioneers to submit to its whim. In its vastness, the land seems beyond transformation, always holding individual pioneers in its grasp. Yet over time, though no individual pioneer can conquer the land, the cumulative spirit of generations of pioneers is a force unto itself. Through the collective successes and failures of these individuals, the land is indeed transformed.

Alexandra Bergson's relationship with the land epitomizes this grand struggle between human agency and the larger forces that manipulate individuals. Alexandra exerts her will upon the land even as it bends and shapes her. Yet her relationship with the land goes deeper than mere control or influence. She is, to some extent, an incarnation of the land. At the same time, she seems curiously empty of human emotion and personality: "As a woman," writes the critic Blanche Gelfant, "Alexandra lacks a personal inner life." Her relationship with Carl Linstrum seems strangely devoid of romance; her attachment to him is largely unemotional. Her recurring fantasies of a man who resembles a mythical corn god demonstrate her connection to the land and dissociation from conventional society. Her story can be seen, Gelfant suggests, as a kind of creation myth, a universalized story about the cultivation and settlement of the American West. Alexandra's story may be, as Carl suggests, merely one of "two or three human stories which repeat themselves."

As it depicts individuals within a massive, unforgiving landscape, the novel puts very little faith in the ability of individuals to control their lives. Nor does it have much faith in the human capacity to form meaningful and lasting relationships: tragic and abortive relationships, especially unhappy marriages, abound in O Pioneers!. In the end, then, Cather's novel celebrates the ambitious idea and hard reality of pioneer America, but remains skeptical about the individual pioneer's capacity for happiness within the confines of traditional social relationships, and about the individual pioneer's ability to affect history through positive action. Yet, while Alexandra occupies a very familiar cultural space--that of the individual struggling against larger forces--the novel neither resolves the question of human historical agency nor, because of her great will and deep respect for the pioneer spirit, depersonalizes Alexandra by consigning her to a stereotype. By novel's end, through a sort of passive, stoic will that seems to mirror the will of the land, Alexandra is able to avoid loneliness in her union with Carl and gain some measure of individuality.

You'll need to sign up to view the entire essay.

Sign Up Now, It's FREE
Filter Your Search Results: